NC House Bill 563 is a Step Backward for North Carolina

Spread the love

In recent years, there has been a significant shift towards supporting local farmers providing farm direct hemp, reducing government interference, and promoting states’ agricultural capacities. However, not all legislation aligns with this vision. A clear example of this misalignment is NC House Bill 563.

This bill, while presented as a boon to North Carolina’s agriculture, could have detrimental effects on local farmers, expand the bureaucratic reach, and inadvertently support out-of-state hemp vendors.

View the bill’s contents on the NC General State Assembly website here.

1. Damaging North Carolina Farmers

Barrier to Entry: House Bill 563 places stringent requirements and stipulations on local farmers. These additional hoops not only increase the costs for farmers but can also serve as discouraging barriers for those looking to enter or sustain their position in the hemp industry.

Price Inflation: Due to the increased regulations and standards, the cost of production for local farmers can skyrocket. This inflation then translates to higher prices for consumers, making local hemp products less competitive in the market.


2. Unnecessary Expansion of Government

Increased Oversight: This bill mandates additional oversight, checks, and controls over hemp farming in North Carolina. Such interference often leads to the creation of new bureaucratic entities or the expansion of existing ones, complicating an already intricate system, especially for farm direct hemp.

Resource Allocation: With the introduction of more regulations, there will be a necessity for more resources to ensure compliance. This means allocating more taxpayer money towards the enforcement of these regulations rather than channeling it to more pressing needs.


3. Encouraging Purchases from Out-of-State Hemp Vendors

Less Competitive Pricing: As mentioned earlier, the increase in production costs for local farmers will make their products pricier. Retailers, always on the lookout for competitive pricing to attract customers, might turn their sights towards out-of-state vendors offering more affordable rates, rather than supporting local farm direct hemp.

Quality Concerns: One of the primary reasons for buying local is the guarantee of quality. By encouraging purchases from out-of-state vendors, we’re risking the introduction of products that might not adhere to the high standards that North Carolina farmers are held to.

Economic Shift: The potential shift towards out-of-state hemp purchases means a substantial portion of the money that could be circulating within North Carolina’s economy will go elsewhere. This is detrimental not just for local farmers but for the entire state’s economic health.


In conclusion, while the intentions behind NC House Bill 563 might have been to regulate and ensure the quality of hemp production in North Carolina, its implications can have the opposite effect. It’s crucial for policymakers to consider the broader impacts of such legislation. By supporting local farmers (like us, who offer farm direct hemp), keeping governmental reach in check, and ensuring economic prosperity remains within the state, North Carolina can continue to be a leader in the agricultural sector.

Leave a comment on our social media and let us know what you think about NC House Bill 563. You can also view our farm direct hemp in our online store, and support your local hemp farm directly.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *